‘Complete double standard’: Tobacco giant opposed regulations in Africa that are law in UK
British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.
Campaign in Zambia
A letter obtained by media originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.
The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.
Health advocate reaction
“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.
More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.
The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through civil society groups.
International corporate influence worries
This occurs during expanded apprehension about industry interference with health policies. In recent weeks, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.
“Evidence exists of industry lobbying worldwide. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.
Potential consequences
“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”
The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.
Corporate counter-proposals
Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum one year after the bill passes.
Global health authorities specifically advises a warning should cover at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.
Flavored tobacco discussion
BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.
The pending regulation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.
Corporate defense
Through correspondence, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”
Activist reaction
The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.
The reality that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.
“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”
Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”
Official corporate statement
A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with current country statutes. Further, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”
The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.
“We support developing rules to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, noting that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which encompasses rising levels of black market activity”.
Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.